Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R5 M435
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R5 M435, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R5 M435 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 M435
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 580 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 105% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 214% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 40% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 43% more, than Radeon R5 M435. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Jet |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 40 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon R5 M435 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 8750M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 4830
- Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon HD 8750M
- Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon HD 4830