Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R7 M270DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R7 M270DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | eDRAM | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 77% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 87% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Topaz |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 40 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 940 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon E6760
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs HD Graphics 515
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs HD Graphics 515