Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 M465X
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R7 M465X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R7 M465X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M465X
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 40 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs FirePro W5130M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M360
- Radeon R7 M465X vs FirePro W5130M
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon R9 M360