Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 40 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370