Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M360
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R9 M360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M360
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M360.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M360. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 40 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 M465X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7750
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon R7 M465X
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon HD 7750