Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
IGP
Memory type
eDRAM
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 44% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 731 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
220−230
medium / 768p
130−140
190−200
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−110
QHD / 1440p
35−40
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
100−110
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 67% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−33
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−12
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
60−65
medium / 768p
21−24
40−45
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 81% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
GCN 4.0
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Polaris 22
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
1 February 2018
Pipelines
40
1280
Core clock speed
200 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
80.88
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price