Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 428% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 125 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 374 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 67% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 40 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 392 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Tesla C2050 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M