Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 428% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 122 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 374 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
| Code name | Haswell GT3e | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Tesla C2070 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost