Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
eDRAM
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
30−33
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
200−210
medium / 768p
130−140
170−180
ultra / 1080p
65−70
90−95
QHD / 1440p
35−40
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
24−27
high / 768p
100−110
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
90−95
ultra / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
95−100
medium / 1080p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 38% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
80−85
medium / 768p
55−60
70−75
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
50−55
medium / 768p
21−24
30−35
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
7−8
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
high / 768p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
15 August 2020
Pipelines
40
96
Core clock speed
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
