Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 617
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics 617 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 617 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics 617 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics 617 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or UHD Graphics 617 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
UHD Graphics 617
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
eDRAM
DDR3L/LPDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 200% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 617.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 617 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and UHD Graphics 617 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
Core clock speed of UHD Graphics 617 is 100 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 617 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
3−4
ultra / 1080p
5−6
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
high / 1080p
14−16
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics 617 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
120−130
medium / 768p
130−140
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
45−50
QHD / 1440p
35−40
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
100−110
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
high / 1080p
10−12
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
4−5
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 36% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
high / 1080p
16−18
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
low / 768p
60−65
50−55
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
18−20
9−10
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
high / 1080p
6−7
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
8−9
medium / 1080p
8−9
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
95−100
70−75
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 26% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
30−33
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
low / 768p
30−35
18−20
medium / 768p
21−24
12−14
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
40−45
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
UHD Graphics 617
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Gen. 9 Amber Lake
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Kaby-Lake GT2
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
30 October 2018
Pipelines
40
24
Core clock speed
200 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
25.20
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.103
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
