Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 630
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics 630, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics 630.
UHD Graphics 630
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | eDRAM | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 200% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and UHD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of UHD Graphics 630 is 100 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 47% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 31% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than UHD Graphics 630. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 1 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 40 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 26.45 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
Shared memory | + | + |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.1.103 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | + |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon RX 550X
- UHD Graphics 630 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs FirePro W4190M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
- UHD Graphics 630 vs FirePro W4190M
- UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge