FireStream 9250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
When comparing FireStream 9250 and Iris Pro Graphics 580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9250
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 63 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 275 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | RV770 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce GT 650M
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- FireStream 9250 vs FirePro M6000
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs FirePro M6000