GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1728 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 892 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GT200B | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- GeForce GTX 295 vs FirePro M6000
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs FirePro M6000