GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics 580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 278 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GK106 | Skylake GT4e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 72 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- GeForce GTX 760A vs FirePro M6000
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs FirePro M6000