GRID M60 8Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 8Q stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 580, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 56 GB more memory, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 207 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 118% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 47% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 82% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GM204 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |