Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 620% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 63 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 250 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 1600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 38% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 72 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |