Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro K4000M
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro K4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro K4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro K4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro K4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 or Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro K4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4000M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 250 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
170−180
medium / 768p
130−140
140−150
ultra / 1080p
65−70
70−75
QHD / 1440p
35−40
40−45
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
70−75
75−80
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
75−80
medium / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
6−7
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
20−22
medium / 1080p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
90−95
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
18−20
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
30−35
35−40
medium / 768p
21−24
24−27
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
50−55
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
high / 768p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro K4000M
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Kepler
Code name
Skylake GT4e
N14E-Q3
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
72
960
Core clock speed
350 MHz
600 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
48.08
Floating-point performance
1,154 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
37 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
