Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro M4000
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro M4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro M4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
120 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000 has 700% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 56 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M4000 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 423 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
150−160
250−260
medium / 768p
130−140
220−230
ultra / 1080p
65−70
180−190
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
95−100
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
70−75
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−12
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
70−75
180−190
medium / 1080p
30−35
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 209% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
120−130
high / 1080p
16−18
70−75
ultra / 1080p
8−9
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 165% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
30−35
130−140
medium / 768p
21−24
85−90
high / 1080p
10−12
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
50−55
high / 768p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro M4000
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GM204
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
29 June 2015
Pipelines
72
1664
Core clock speed
350 MHz
773 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
80.39
Floating-point performance
2,573 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
+
CUDA
5.2
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
299 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Multi-display synchronization
Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6
+
Check Price
Check Price