Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro P400
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro P400, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro P400 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro P400
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P400 has 100% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro P400 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro P400.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro P400 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro P400 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P400 is 878 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro P400 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 10% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
140−150
medium / 768p
130−140
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
95−100
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p
10−11
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 10% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p
30−35
27−30
medium / 768p
21−24
18−20
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro P400.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro P400
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Pascal
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GP107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
7 February 2017
Pipelines
72
256
Core clock speed
350 MHz
1228 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1252 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
20.03
Floating-point performance
679.9 gflops
Length
145 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
32.06 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
