Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon Pro 460
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 460 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon Pro 460 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
150−160
220−230
medium / 768p
130−140
190−200
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−110
QHD / 1440p
35−40
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
95−100
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 72% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−33
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−12
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
60−65
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
30−35
60−65
medium / 768p
21−24
40−45
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 81% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Polaris
Code name
Skylake GT4e
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
8 August 2016
Pipelines
72
1024
Core clock speed
350 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
