Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 580 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 63 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 375 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2000% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 303% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 227% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 83% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Meso |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 72 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |