Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 61 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 224 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 72% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 72 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |