Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 58 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 224 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 72 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |