FirePro M4100 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4100 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4100 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4100 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4100 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4100
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 370 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
4−5
ultra / 1080p
0−1
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than FirePro M4100.
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
85−90
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
high / 768p
65−70
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
2−3
6−7
ultra / 1080p
2−3
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
3−4
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
QHD / 1440p
2−3
−
low / 720p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 10% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
5−6
8−9
ultra / 1080p
2−3
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
−
FirePro M4100 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
1−2
3−4
ultra / 1080p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
5−6
8−9
medium / 1080p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
85−90
80−85
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M4100.
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
12−14
16−18
medium / 768p
9−10
12−14
high / 1080p
4−5
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
75−80
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
FirePro M4100 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
FirePro M4100
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
GCN
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
Mars
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 October 2013
2 June 2015
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
670 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
16.08
40.80
Floating-point performance
514.6 gflops
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.80
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
74 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
