FirePro M4150 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
FirePro M4150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 415 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
FirePro M4150 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 15% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
FirePro M4150 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | Opal | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- FirePro M4150 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2