FirePro S7000 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 318% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 122% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 314% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 195% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 284% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 320% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | Pitcairn | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 270
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- FirePro S7000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2