FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing FirePro V5800 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 393% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 390 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro V5800 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | Juniper | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 M370
- FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K2100M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro K2100M
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- FirePro V5800 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2