FirePro W7170M vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing FirePro W7170M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W7170M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W7170M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W7170M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 423 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
7−8
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
16−18
medium / 1080p
35−40
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
230−240
110−120
medium / 768p
200−210
85−90
ultra / 1080p
110−120
40−45
QHD / 1440p
85−90
24−27
4K / 2160p
45−50
−
high / 768p
160−170
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 143% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
12−14
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
120−130
70−75
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
75−80
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
6−7
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
3−4
low / 720p
50−55
12−14
medium / 1080p
24−27
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 271% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
8−9
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
50−55
medium / 1080p
70−75
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 186% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
9−10
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 246% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
40−45
medium / 768p
90−95
35−40
high / 1080p
40−45
8−9
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
3−4
ultra / 1080p
10−11
2−3
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
20−22
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
16−18
medium / 768p
45−50
12−14
high / 1080p
24−27
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
GCN 3
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
Tonga
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
2 October 2015
2 June 2015
Pipelines
2048
48
Core clock speed
723 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
92.54
40.80
Floating-point performance
2,961 gflops
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.80
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
Quick Sync
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price