FireStream 9270 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 6200, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9270
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FireStream 9270 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
FireStream 9270 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | RV770 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce 930MX
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- FireStream 9270 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2