FireStream 9370 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FireStream 9370

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs
		Check Price

FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	4−5
ultra / 1080p	7−8	3−4
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	16−18	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	16−18
medium / 1080p	21−24	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9370 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	110−120
medium / 768p	160−170	85−90
ultra / 1080p	85−90	40−45
QHD / 1440p	45−50	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	120−130	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	85−90	45−50
ultra / 1080p	55−60	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
4K / 2160p	5−6	3−4
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	85−90	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	21−24	9−10
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	18−20
medium / 1080p	24−27	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 138% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	75−80	40−45
medium / 768p	65−70	35−40
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	10−11	5−6
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	8−9	3−4
ultra / 1080p	6−7	2−3
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	8−9
medium / 1080p	10−12	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	95−100	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	8−9
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	45−50	16−18
medium / 768p	27−30	12−14
high / 1080p	16−18	7−8
ultra / 1080p	9−10	5−6
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	95−100	80−85
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name	Cypress	Broadwell GT3e
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	23 June 2010	2 June 2015
Pipelines	1600	48
Core clock speed	825 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	40.80
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	883.2 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.80
Laptop size		medium sized
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

FireStream 9370 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares