GeForce 830A vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing GeForce 830A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 830A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 830A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 830A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 830A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce 830A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 830A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 830A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 830A is 782 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce 830A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 830A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830A in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 15% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
GeForce 830A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830A in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce 830A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 830A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GM108 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 22 July 2014 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 256 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 830A vs FirePro M4150
- GeForce 830A vs Radeon R7 M460
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs FirePro M4150
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 M460
- GeForce 830A vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce 830A vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2