GeForce 8800 GTX vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 8800 GTX will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 8800 GTX
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 933% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 8800 GTX is 276 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | G80 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 November 2006 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 681 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 270 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 8730M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2