GeForce GT 735M vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing GeForce GT 735M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 735M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GT 735M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GT 735M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 735M or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 735M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GT 735M has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GT 735M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 735M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 735M is 275 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GT 735M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GT 735M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 735M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
110−120
medium / 768p
27−30
85−90
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than GeForce GT 735M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 735M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce GT 735M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
6−7
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GT 735M.
high / 1080p
0−1
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−11
low / 768p
18−20
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce GT 735M.
high / 1080p
−
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
8−9
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce GT 735M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce GT 735M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
8−9
low / 768p
0−1
16−18
medium / 768p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce GT 735M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 735M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
N14M-LP
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
1 April 2013
2 June 2015
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
575 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
889 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
18.40
40.80
Floating-point performance
441.6 gflops
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
39 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Standard memory configuration
DDR3
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price