GeForce GT 750M vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 750M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GT 750M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GT 750M has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 667 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
5−6
4−5
ultra / 1080p
2−3
3−4
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
7−8
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
85−90
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
QHD / 1440p
27−30
24−27
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
high / 768p
80−85
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GT 750M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
7−8
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
4K / 2160p
5−6
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
60−65
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
50−55
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
10−12
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
45−50
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
3−4
ultra / 1080p
1−2
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
8−9
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
GeForce GT 750M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than GeForce GT 750M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
8−9
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
21−24
16−18
medium / 768p
14−16
12−14
high / 1080p
6−7
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
75−80
80−85
medium / 768p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
N14P-GT
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
1 April 2013
2 June 2015
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
967 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
967 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.94
40.80
Floating-point performance
742.7 gflops
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 - 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.19 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Standard memory configuration
DDR3/GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
