GeForce GTS 160M vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR3
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 160M has 300% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 1200 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
110−120
medium / 768p
27−30
85−90
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
6−7
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−11
low / 768p
18−20
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
8−9
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
8−9
low / 768p
0−1
16−18
medium / 768p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
G9x
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
N10E-GS1
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 March 2009
2 June 2015
Pipelines
64
48
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
40.80
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price