GeForce GTS 450 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 450 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 450 stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 6200, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
106 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 450 has 606% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTS 450 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTS 450 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 450 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 450 is 1266 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
4−5
ultra / 1080p
1−2
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
GeForce GTS 450 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 450 in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
85−90
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−33
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 450 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
4−5
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 450 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
7−8
9−10
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
GeForce GTS 450 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
50−55
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
8−9
medium / 1080p
4−5
5−6
GeForce GTS 450 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
65−70
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
8−9
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
18−20
16−18
medium / 768p
12−14
12−14
high / 1080p
6−7
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
GeForce GTS 450 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
GF106
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
13 September 2010
2 June 2015
Pipelines
192
48
Core clock speed
1566 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
25.1 billion/sec
40.80
Floating-point performance
601.3 gflops
883.2 gflops
Length
8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.7 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
