GeForce GTX 260 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 1113% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 942 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
4−5
ultra / 1080p
1−2
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
85−90
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
4−5
6−7
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
7−8
9−10
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
8−9
medium / 1080p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
65−70
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
16−18
medium / 768p
12−14
12−14
high / 1080p
6−7
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
GT200
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
16 June 2008
2 June 2015
Pipelines
192
48
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
40.80
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
883.2 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
