GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 479 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 59% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GF114 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 2 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2