GeForce GTX 465 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 1233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 915 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
4−5
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
7−8
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
110−120
medium / 768p
170−180
85−90
ultra / 1080p
95−100
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
130−140
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
4K / 2160p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 171% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 118% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
18−20
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
40−45
medium / 768p
70−75
35−40
high / 1080p
27−30
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
3−4
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
24−27
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
50−55
16−18
medium / 768p
30−35
12−14
high / 1080p
18−20
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
GF100
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
2 June 2015
Pipelines
352
48
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
40.80
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
883.2 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price