GeForce GTX 680M vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680M will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 680M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 680M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 680M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 680M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 680M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 680M is 420 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
20−22
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
55−60
16−18
medium / 1080p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 680M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
110−120
medium / 768p
180−190
85−90
ultra / 1080p
100−110
40−45
QHD / 1440p
55−60
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−35
−
high / 768p
140−150
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
70−75
medium / 768p
95−100
45−50
ultra / 1080p
65−70
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
18−20
6−7
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
21−24
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
27−30
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
55−60
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Fortnite is 140% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
27−30
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
55−60
18−20
medium / 1080p
30−35
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
40−45
medium / 768p
80−85
35−40
high / 1080p
30−35
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
10−11
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
14−16
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
24−27
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
16−18
medium / 768p
35−40
12−14
high / 1080p
20−22
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
N13E-GTX
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
4 June 2012
2 June 2015
Pipelines
1344
48
Core clock speed
720 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
758 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
80.6 billion/sec
40.80
Floating-point performance
2,038 gflops
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
115.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
100 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price