GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 760A
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 328 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GK106 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 2 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2