GeForce GTX 965M vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 965M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 965M will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 965M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 965M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 644 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
7−8
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
16−18
medium / 1080p
35−40
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
230−240
110−120
medium / 768p
200−210
85−90
ultra / 1080p
110−120
40−45
QHD / 1440p
85−90
24−27
4K / 2160p
45−50
−
high / 768p
160−170
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 143% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
12−14
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
120−130
70−75
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
75−80
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
6−7
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
3−4
low / 720p
50−55
12−14
medium / 1080p
27−30
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
8−9
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
50−55
medium / 1080p
70−75
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 186% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
9−10
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 246% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
40−45
medium / 768p
90−95
35−40
high / 1080p
40−45
8−9
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
3−4
ultra / 1080p
10−11
2−3
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
20−22
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
16−18
medium / 768p
45−50
12−14
high / 1080p
24−27
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
N16E-GS, N16E-GR
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 January 2015
2 June 2015
Pipelines
1024
48
Core clock speed
944 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
950 / 1151 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
73.60
40.80
Floating-point performance
2,355 gflops
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
G-SYNC support
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1024
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
226 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
GameStream
+
GeForce ShadowPlay
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
BatteryBoost
+
Check Price
Check Price