GRID K520 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When choosing between GRID K520 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 140% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GK104 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |