GRID M10 8Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GRID M10 8Q
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 733 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 157% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 138% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GM107 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 950M
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 850M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 950M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 850M
- GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GRID M10 8Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2