GRID M6 8Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 422 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 134% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 163% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 238% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GM204 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |