GRID M60 8Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 257 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 143% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 271% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 186% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 246% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GM204 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K2200M
- GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K5000
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro K2200M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro K5000
- GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GRID M60 8Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2