HD Graphics P630 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between HD Graphics P630 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics P630 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics P630
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 15 Watt.
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- HD Graphics P630 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| HD Graphics P630 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| HD Graphics P630 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| HD Graphics P630 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 August 2016 | 2 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
| Shared memory | + | + |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.80 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | + |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- HD Graphics P630 vs GeForce GTX 460M
- HD Graphics P630 vs HD Graphics 630
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 460M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs HD Graphics 630
- HD Graphics P630 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- HD Graphics P630 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2