Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro 4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro 4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 175 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
3−4
ultra / 1080p
3−4
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
8−9
8−9
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
95−100
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
6−7
5−6
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
8−9
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
7−8
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
80−85
65−70
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
16−18
16−18
medium / 768p
12−14
12−14
high / 1080p
7−8
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro 4000M
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Fermi
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
48
336
Core clock speed
300 MHz
475 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
26.60
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
638.4 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.80
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
