Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro 500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 stacks up against Quadro 500M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 500M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Quadro 500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 500M has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro 500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro 500M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 500M is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 500M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Quadro 500M | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GF108 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 11.20 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Quadro 500M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce 820A
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 M340
- Quadro 500M vs GeForce 820A
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M340