Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro K1000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K1000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K1000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
System Shared
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K1000M has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
1−2
medium / 1080p
5−6
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
27−30
ultra / 1080p
40−45
7−8
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
high / 768p
60−65
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−11
0−1
low / 768p
40−45
18−20
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
high / 1080p
80−85
27−30
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
24−27
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
0−1
low / 768p
16−18
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
0−1
high / 768p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Kepler
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
N14P-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
48
192
Core clock speed
300 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
13.60
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
326.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price